Not Pokimane volunteers her face for some model tests - 256 DF-D vs DF-UD
Duration: 19:47
Views: 163 523
Submitted: 1 year ago
Submitted by:
Celebrities:
Pokimane
Original Pornstar: Unknown
Description:
Some more model tests, this time I've done same scene as df_7777 //deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/user/302949 used in his video: //deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/video/11644/fake-pokimane-casting-couch using the shared DST from Groggy4 //deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/user/3163 and SRC from df_7777.
His model is 448 DF-UD, I've used my two DF-D and DF-UD models at 256 (Full Face) and with slightly higher dims on both.
Merged both twice, first with same merger settings as df_7777 and no post processing or merger upscale and 2nd time with slightly different merging settings, merger upscaler and post processing, 5th run was done on my bigger SRC set for half the time the others were trained for and on the same base DF-UD model and merged with slightly different merger settings too so in total there are 5 different videos here, at the end there are still frames without any extra post processing, straight from the merger of all 5 attempts.
Obviously I didn't include df_7777 attempt here so for that you will have to watch his video. In either case SRC was quite blurry as Pokimane doesn't have a lot of good 1080p, let alone 4K out there so GAN didn't improve results that much (all mine and his models were trained with GAN set to 0.1).
Let me know in the comments which out of the 5 of my attempts look best and if I managed in your opinion to match the 448 model quality. I'm myself not seeing that much difference between non upscaled and upscaled + post -D model, with -UD the difference is much bigger and somehow the -UD upscaled model ended up being more blurry than either -D or non upscaled -UD which is really weird, especially since at the end of training -UD had lower loss and for some time -UD model was trained on higher batch size (in the later stage all models were trained at batch 6 and then on LRD and LRD + GAN batch size of 4 was used). -UD definitely looks better when the head is facing down, profiles seem to also look a bit better and overall lighting seems to be a bit better but -D somehow manages to look sharper. Also -UD model had slightly higher dims (336/84) vs the -D model (288/72) and was pretrained with smaller pretrain dataset that had only white and asian faces and more high res faces, -D model had bigger pretrain dataset that had all races and had more blurry faces in it.
If you enjoyed it make sure to press the like button, add it to your favorites and subscribe to my profile to be always up to date with my newest releases!
If you liked this video make sure to hit the like button, add this video to your favorites and subscribe to my profile! (you can then find my videos in your subscription page, upper right corner, next to messages and log out).
I put a lot of work and time into making those edits, please consider supporting me with a donation or video download using tokens (which supports me and the website). To donate to me click on the donate button next to my profile name under any of my videos and select cryptocurrency to find my BTC address or PM me for address.
Also the more given celebrity lookalike gets downloaded with tokens the more content of her I make!
Check my forum thread too where you can vote in the poll and decide what I make next! You can also suggest pornstar matches to celebs I make or plan on making, suggest scenes to edit or just simply request celebs and see what I'm working on right now, talk with me and so on:
//deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/forums/thread-request-poll-voting-vote-for-which-deepfake-you-want-to-see
I also make custom fakes of all celebs, if you want to order a public or private video please contact me here on the website or on our forum for details.
His model is 448 DF-UD, I've used my two DF-D and DF-UD models at 256 (Full Face) and with slightly higher dims on both.
Merged both twice, first with same merger settings as df_7777 and no post processing or merger upscale and 2nd time with slightly different merging settings, merger upscaler and post processing, 5th run was done on my bigger SRC set for half the time the others were trained for and on the same base DF-UD model and merged with slightly different merger settings too so in total there are 5 different videos here, at the end there are still frames without any extra post processing, straight from the merger of all 5 attempts.
Obviously I didn't include df_7777 attempt here so for that you will have to watch his video. In either case SRC was quite blurry as Pokimane doesn't have a lot of good 1080p, let alone 4K out there so GAN didn't improve results that much (all mine and his models were trained with GAN set to 0.1).
Let me know in the comments which out of the 5 of my attempts look best and if I managed in your opinion to match the 448 model quality. I'm myself not seeing that much difference between non upscaled and upscaled + post -D model, with -UD the difference is much bigger and somehow the -UD upscaled model ended up being more blurry than either -D or non upscaled -UD which is really weird, especially since at the end of training -UD had lower loss and for some time -UD model was trained on higher batch size (in the later stage all models were trained at batch 6 and then on LRD and LRD + GAN batch size of 4 was used). -UD definitely looks better when the head is facing down, profiles seem to also look a bit better and overall lighting seems to be a bit better but -D somehow manages to look sharper. Also -UD model had slightly higher dims (336/84) vs the -D model (288/72) and was pretrained with smaller pretrain dataset that had only white and asian faces and more high res faces, -D model had bigger pretrain dataset that had all races and had more blurry faces in it.
If you enjoyed it make sure to press the like button, add it to your favorites and subscribe to my profile to be always up to date with my newest releases!
If you liked this video make sure to hit the like button, add this video to your favorites and subscribe to my profile! (you can then find my videos in your subscription page, upper right corner, next to messages and log out).
I put a lot of work and time into making those edits, please consider supporting me with a donation or video download using tokens (which supports me and the website). To donate to me click on the donate button next to my profile name under any of my videos and select cryptocurrency to find my BTC address or PM me for address.
Also the more given celebrity lookalike gets downloaded with tokens the more content of her I make!
Check my forum thread too where you can vote in the poll and decide what I make next! You can also suggest pornstar matches to celebs I make or plan on making, suggest scenes to edit or just simply request celebs and see what I'm working on right now, talk with me and so on:
//deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/forums/thread-request-poll-voting-vote-for-which-deepfake-you-want-to-see
I also make custom fakes of all celebs, if you want to order a public or private video please contact me here on the website or on our forum for details.
Tags:
pokimane
Pokimane porn
pokimane fucking
pokimane sex
pokimane blowjob
pokimane cumshot
pokimane facial
saehd
DFL
dfl2.0
deepfacelab 2.0
model test
xseg test
model comparison
deepfake test
attempt
Test
pokimane deepfake
pokimane fake
pokimane nude
tmb-df
tmbdf
truly mindblowing deepfakes
twitch
twitch streamer
Download now to support TMBDF
Not Pokimane volunteers her face for some model tests - 256 DF-D vs DF-UD
You currently have 0 tokens available
Insufficient tokens - 400 Required
Buy more tokens
«New poll, go vote for who I should do next: //deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/forums/thread-tmb-df-fan-subscriber-thread-video-uploads-and-polls?pid=28846#pid28846»
Reply
«Just a reminder, today is the last day to submit your requests for next celeb videos, tomorrow I'll be posting a new poll for regular porn fakes, you will be able to find link to that poll in my forum thread:
//deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/forums/thread-request-poll-voting-vote-for-which-deepfake-you-want-to-see
Again, if you're requesting less popular celeb or someone I haven't done before please make sure to provide a suitable pornstar match along with the celebrity name, you can either post it in comments as a reply to this one or in that thread.»
Reply
«please make elanur pat»
Reply
Reply to: efE
1 year ago«PM me for details.»
Ответить
«more Billie Eilish please »
Reply
Reply to: FaelHD
1 year ago«Coming up next! »
Ответить
«haha yes i love your page, we like the same girls, keep it up, could we maybe see some sommer ray ?»
Reply
«So this is a full face type but used on a WF Xseg labeled DST right ? It would be interesting to compare with a pure F type mask both SRC and DST without Xseg, with a little of True Face. Obviously the Bj would be ruined but i'm curious how the rest of the video would look like, it might look closer to the real Poki.»
Reply
Reply to: Kuzuryushin
1 year ago«Both datasets were WF XSeg masked by their authors and FF model was trained on that and then during merging I've used my own XSeg to mask the faces using XSeg-DST mask mode.
True face was not an option since didn't use it. Usually I try to not use TF as it tends to give bad results but maybe with lower value on -UD it could look good as it matches lighting better than -D. Maybe I will try it on next test I'm doing now (Maisie Williams).
Would the face type make difference? Not if I'd train FF XSeg using my collection of WF marked WF faces, the mask would be identical since with FF XSeg it would crop the mask to FF size, if I use WF mask then it's the SAEHD model that crops it as it doesn't cover more area - this would mean that both would look identical (in theory.
The only way to get different results would be to have all faces marked only to eyebrows or not use applied masks during training as it's meant to be with FF models. Also I'm using a modified DFL where I can enable masked training on full face models so maybe that has something to do with it.
I'll see how it looks on the Maisie test, will do 3rd run with -UD but instead of doing masked training enabled and XSeg masks I will do masked training disabled, default masks and not use XSeg and do learned-dst during merging to see if the face shape/appearance changes based on the that (mask shape). Thanks for suggestion »
Ответить
Reply to: TMBDF
1 year ago«I see, yeah i'm curious too. I'll check the Maisie test.
Very interesting video thanks !»
Ответить
Reply to: TMBDF
1 year ago«I forgot to answer the main question but i think, the 448 res got matched. Atleast to me. But like you said, results may be differents if there was more 1080p or 4k footage to build the face set upon.
Thanks !
Something i'm also curious about is, how having larger images than 512x512 really affect the results quality, like using 800x800 or higher of a 4K close up video. The merging part would take longer and things like color transfer or sharpening might take forever and get bad results but granted we've done a good job finding a model really matching our celeb in every way, the skin tone and everything.
Trained with a 320 or higher dims hmmm. yeah this is something i would like to know, how images res truely impact the quality.
Maybe someone covered it already and i missed it on the forum, i'll look again.»
Ответить
«Billie Eilish pleaseeeee, Bigger boobs is perfect»
Reply
«Here is the version by df_7777, same SRC, same DST, only difference is model resolution which is 448, compare it to 5 attempts I've made, more details about the test in the video details: //deep.whitecatchel.ru/literotica/video/11644/fake-pokimane-casting-couch
For the next deepfake since there is no next poll and I didn't get many suggestions (and what I got I either already made or I'm making) leave in the comments who I should do next? Freya Allan, Billie Eilish, ScarJo or someone more rare like Ellie Kemper?»
Reply
Reply to: TMBDF
1 year ago«How about some underfaked beauties?
Emily Osment,Brittany Snow,Nina Dobrev,Sophia Bush,Julianne Hough?»
Ответить
Reply to: TMBDF
1 year ago«Nice results, I think my favorite is Upscaled DF-D. Also, what is the 'merger upscale', is this a option in the merger (super res ?) or another software ?»
Ответить
Reply to: TMBDF
1 year ago«Hayley Williams»
Ответить
Reply to: Hammerfist
1 year ago«Did I list Hayley as an option? »
Ответить
Reply to: cartman26
1 year ago«If more people request one of them why not, otherwise it will be one of those 4.»
Ответить
Reply to: TMBDF
1 year ago«Would definitely like to see some Ellie Kemper.»
Ответить